As we seen in chapter 4, the polynomial ring shares many properties with the ring of integers . We have seen we have division algorithm, Bezout’s theorem, unique factorization, etc. In this chapter, we will see the analog of in the context of polynomials.

To define congruence in , we will fix a nonzero polynomial as modulus. One should think this is similar with fixing an integer before defining congruence in .

Congruence relation in

Recall the congruence relation in : if . We can define a similar relation in :

Definition:

Given two polynomials , we say is congruent to modulo a nonzero , denoted as , if .

The congruence relation in satisfies the reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity properties. The same holds for the congruence relation in .

Theorem

The congruence relation in is an equivalence relation, i.e. we have:

  1. Reflexivity: for all .
  2. Symmetry: If , then .
  3. Transitivity: If and , then .

Congruence classes in

Back in 2_1_1_congruence_classes, we spent a lot of time to define the congruence classes in . The key idea is define as the set of all integers congruent to modulo . We do the same for .

Definition:

Given a polynomial and a nonzero polynomial , the congruence class of modulo is the set:

The set of all congruence classes is denoted as .

The congruence class has similar translation invariant property when we add a multiple of :

We can keep applying the translation property to get the following:

Proposition

For any polynomial , we have:

One natural question then is how many congruence classes are there in modulo ? In , we have exactly congruence classes. But things are bit different in , we usually get infinitely many congruence classes modulo when is an infinite field.

To make the picture more clear, we have precisely:

as distinct congruence classes in . They are precisely the possible remainders when we divide an integer by .

So the correct generalization route is recall the [[4_1_poly_division#Division algorithm in |division algorithm]] in , and see what are the possible remainders when we divide a polynomial by .

Theorem

As a set, can be identified with all polynomials such that .

Proof of the theorem

Let be any polynomial. By the division algorithm, we can write:

where and . We have:

Therefore, . This shows that every congruence class in can be represented by a polynomial with .

We now show two distinct polynomials with and give distinct congruence classes. Suppose , then . Since , we must have , i.e. .

In particular, we will get back to the base field if we take the modulus for some .

Corollary

is isomorphic to .

as a ring

We have shown the congruence class admits a natural ring structure. We can do the same for .

Theorem

The set is a ring with addition and multiplication defined as:

The ring is called the quotient ring of by the ideal generated by , denoted as . Though we will define the ideal in the next chapter.