As we seen in chapter 4, the polynomial ring shares many properties with the ring of integers . We have seen we have division algorithm, Bezout’s theorem, unique factorization, etc. In this chapter, we will see the analog of in the context of polynomials.
To define congruence in , we will fix a nonzero polynomial as modulus. One should think this is similar with fixing an integer before defining congruence in .
Congruence relation in
Recall the congruence relation in : if . We can define a similar relation in :
Definition:
Given two polynomials , we say is congruent to modulo a nonzero , denoted as , if .
The congruence relation in satisfies the reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity properties. The same holds for the congruence relation in .
Theorem
The congruence relation in is an equivalence relation, i.e. we have:
- Reflexivity: for all .
- Symmetry: If , then .
- Transitivity: If and , then .
Congruence classes in
Back in 2_1_1_congruence_classes, we spent a lot of time to define the congruence classes in . The key idea is define as the set of all integers congruent to modulo . We do the same for .
Definition:
Given a polynomial and a nonzero polynomial , the congruence class of modulo is the set:
The set of all congruence classes is denoted as .
The congruence class has similar translation invariant property when we add a multiple of :
We can keep applying the translation property to get the following:
Proposition
For any polynomial , we have:
One natural question then is how many congruence classes are there in modulo ? In , we have exactly congruence classes. But things are bit different in , we usually get infinitely many congruence classes modulo when is an infinite field.
To make the picture more clear, we have precisely:
as distinct congruence classes in . They are precisely the possible remainders when we divide an integer by .
So the correct generalization route is recall the [[4_1_poly_division#Division algorithm in |division algorithm]] in , and see what are the possible remainders when we divide a polynomial by .
Theorem
As a set, can be identified with all polynomials such that .
Proof of the theorem
Let be any polynomial. By the division algorithm, we can write:
where and . We have:
Therefore, . This shows that every congruence class in can be represented by a polynomial with .
We now show two distinct polynomials with and give distinct congruence classes. Suppose , then . Since , we must have , i.e. .
In particular, we will get back to the base field if we take the modulus for some .
Corollary
is isomorphic to .
as a ring
We have shown the congruence class admits a natural ring structure. We can do the same for .
Theorem
The set is a ring with addition and multiplication defined as:
The ring is called the quotient ring of by the ideal generated by , denoted as . Though we will define the ideal in the next chapter.